« Posts under News

Who Are Pseudo-Threats to National Security?

However, very few people are aware that the main activities of western NSAs (national security agencies) are not in relation to terrorists or threats to national security, but in relation to hundreds of pseudo-terrorists or pseudo-threats who have no intentions to kill or harm others.Pseudo-threats are those people whose activities can be mimicked (or aped) by terrorists in order to organize mass murders. Let me provide you some examples for clarity. Imagine that a pseudo-terrorist arrives to a certain city. If terrorists are aware about this trip of the pseudo-terrorist, they do not need to kill this person. Instead, they can organize a terror act related to this trip of this particular person to this particular city. How? For example, the terrorists can organize a crash of a plane that has the same flight number and is supposed to arrive some days later after arrival of a pseudo Signs of Lying -threat.Or imagine that a pseudo-threat started to work in a certain business area. The terrorists can “celebrate” this event (start of a new job) by massacre or murder of somebody else in the same area. Or they can organize some industrial disaster, train crash, building explosion in the neighbouring area, etc. In other words, the terror act mimics the events from the life of the pseudo-threat or relates to him in one or other way. Why can this be done? The terror act is committed for future purposes so that those who analyze such crimes (i.e., national security agents) will realize that appearance of this person results in more deaths of innocent civilians.Another version of the same terror tactic is to kill relatives or associates of the pseudo-threat. Imagine that this pseudo-terrorist forms new business contacts or get clients for his professional job or even meet new friends.

Is Man Smart Enough To Avoid Disasterous Climate Change?

As far as we know, man is the smartest thing ever to evolve, anywhere in the universe. As a species, we are clearly proud of our intelligence, so proud in fact that we named ourselves homo sapiens, meaning “wise” or “knowing” man.Our intelligence has allowed us to understand how our world works and to shape it for our comfort and success. Our intelligence has allowed us to extend the life of many of our species, to eradicate diseases, to leverage our abilities to build things and to communicate in mass yet personal ways. It even allowed us a few times and only briefly, to leave our planet and visit our close neighbour, the moon. Our intelligence means that we love to solve problems: nothing seems out of our reach given enough time and brain power Survive an Affair addressed to it.On the flip side of intelligence are our social structures that have been used to bolster the power of the few. To have a social structure that is hierarchical with a powerful “leader” rising to the top of the pack is reflected in other species. It is not always the most intelligent that become the leaders.No other species has managed the ability we have to interact and co-ordinate to wage war on each other such that one social grouping can gain ascendance over another. None has managed to devise weapons of such ferocity that their use could end all life on Earth. None has devised methods of torture to bring about suffering of one in the name of advancement of another. The paradox of intelligence and power is all too easy to see.

The Absurdity of Leaders

Let’s take for instance the case of a burning building, where in the rage of flames a few struggling individuals looking for a way out by wandering frantically in the smoke. An individual sees a window, an opening, a way out. S/ How to Fix a Broken Relationship he walks towards it, seeking a way to free her/himself from the situation, and in walking towards the window, while the rest of the chaos continues, turns her/his head back and yells to the others that they have found a way out.

The Conviction of Tim Masters: a Travesty of Justice

In March 1999, Tim Masters was convicted for the 1987 Fort Collins, Colorado murder of Peggy Hettrick and given a life sentence based largely on doodles he made when he was 15-years-old. There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime scene.Between the location where Peggy Hettrick was abducted and the field where her body was dumped that early mourning on February 11, 1987, her killer should have left pieces of his DNA on her. As the killer dragged her body through the field, skin cells and a strand of hair from the killer should have fallen onto her clothing.The law of forensic science: when two people come into contact, they leave cells on each other.But the Fort Collins Police ignored this fundamental law of forensic science by losing biological evidence found at the crime scene and destroying evidence linked to a prominent doctor they ne Lying Spouse ver investigated for the crime.Jim Broderick, an over zealous Fort Collins police detective, would not waver from his belief that a 15-year-old boy committed the murder despite no physical evidence. Larimer County prosecutors opposed saving DNA and testing it.The result: an innocent man goes to prison for life for a murder he did not commit.Twenty years after the murder, Masters’ case has become one of the most ambitious and expensive bids ever in Colorado to prove a person’s innocence. Nearly $500,000 has been provided by the Colorado legal defense system and the ambitious efforts of Masters’ legal team has led them to a cutting-edge DNA testing laboratory in the Netherlands, where the killer’s skin cells have been mined from Peggy Hettrick’s clothing using the most-advanced DNA techniques available. The tests show it was not Tim Masters’ skin cells.